My wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
banderite

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
banderite [2023/08/15 02:34] – [Analysis] jgmac1106banderite [2025/05/22 19:59] (current) – jgmac1106
Line 42: Line 42:
 rhizoanalysis provides us with a tool to examine the story of Stepan Bandera ad a  narrative  performance to understand the Affective intensities (Coleman, 2005) of Russian disinformation campaigns.  Russia created a series of Nazi narrative performances, not so much as plan, but a series of folding monads. Self contained lies which in turn had explict connections to other lies to create a new truth that did not exist before. An analysis of how these monads and lines of flight apply help us understand how Russia tries to cast Ukraine as a Nazi state through the narrative of Stepan Bandera. While Russian disinformation tries to establish relationships built through unpredictable texts movements Russia took advantage of places where hate thrives and community is cultivated. rhizoanalysis provides us with a tool to examine the story of Stepan Bandera ad a  narrative  performance to understand the Affective intensities (Coleman, 2005) of Russian disinformation campaigns.  Russia created a series of Nazi narrative performances, not so much as plan, but a series of folding monads. Self contained lies which in turn had explict connections to other lies to create a new truth that did not exist before. An analysis of how these monads and lines of flight apply help us understand how Russia tries to cast Ukraine as a Nazi state through the narrative of Stepan Bandera. While Russian disinformation tries to establish relationships built through unpredictable texts movements Russia took advantage of places where hate thrives and community is cultivated.
  
-We also look to rhizoanalysis as we find the "space," rather than the individuals truth ,or even history, more as the variable of interest for our flights of inquiry. We do not seek to answer, "Was Stepan Bandera a Nazi?" but rather to utilize  rhizoanalysis  as a tool to understand how Russia manipulates the power behind not  “what is” but rather “what could be and could have been.” In other words, or research does not seek to understand the truth but more the textual moves Russia made to shape the folds of monads to their own desgin. +We also look to rhizoanalysis as we find the "space," rather than the individuals truth ,or even history, more as the variable of interest for our flights of inquiry. We do not seek to answer, "Was Stepan Bandera a Nazi?" but rather to utilize  rhizoanalysis  as a tool to understand how Russia manipulates the power behind not  “what is” but rather “what could be and could have been.” In other words, or research does not seek to understand the truth but more the textual moves Russia made to shape the folds of monads to their own design. 
  
 This focus on becoming rather than being is an essential rejection of representational logic (Leander & Rowe, 2006) and also a central reality necessary for studying the unreality that is Modern Russia. Using Deleuze and Guattari’s work on rhizomes allowed us to understand the non linear relationships and how they interact in the creation of false Nazi narratives in Ukraine.   This focus on becoming rather than being is an essential rejection of representational logic (Leander & Rowe, 2006) and also a central reality necessary for studying the unreality that is Modern Russia. Using Deleuze and Guattari’s work on rhizomes allowed us to understand the non linear relationships and how they interact in the creation of false Nazi narratives in Ukraine.  
Line 61: Line 61:
   * Google News search at three time points 2004-2006, 2013-2026, 2022-2023   * Google News search at three time points 2004-2006, 2013-2026, 2022-2023
   * Peer reviewed and retracted articles   * Peer reviewed and retracted articles
 +  * List of [[Ukrainian_OUNB_Cult|Ukrainians]] mentioned as cult
 +  * Publicly available author bios for [[lying-journalist|journalist]] who must know they lie.
 +  * [[Ukrainian Diaspora Journals]]
  
  
Line 77: Line 80:
  
  
-==== Work Cited ====+==== Works Collected ==== 
 + 
 +Artifacts and evidence more than sources
  
 Bekeshkina, I., Sydorchuk, O., Burakovskiy, I., Zolkina, M., Haran, O., Chabanna, M., & Kermach, R. (2017). Constructing a Political Nation: Changes in the Attitudes of Ukrainians during the War in the Donbas. Stylos Publishing. Bekeshkina, I., Sydorchuk, O., Burakovskiy, I., Zolkina, M., Haran, O., Chabanna, M., & Kermach, R. (2017). Constructing a Political Nation: Changes in the Attitudes of Ukrainians during the War in the Donbas. Stylos Publishing.
Line 84: Line 89:
  
 Blumenthal, Max. "Is the US backing neo-Nazis in Ukraine?." AlterNet February 25 (2014).(Russian Disinfo now the Grayzone) Blumenthal, Max. "Is the US backing neo-Nazis in Ukraine?." AlterNet February 25 (2014).(Russian Disinfo now the Grayzone)
 +
 +Grott, B. (2021). Ukrainian nationalism and Viktor Polishchuk as its historian. Review of Nationalities, (11).
  
 Himka, J.-P. 2011a. “The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, the Ukrainian Police, and the Holocaust.” Seventh Annual Danyliw Research Seminar onContemporary. Ukraine, Ottawa, 20–22 Oct. Himka, J.-P. 2011a. “The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, the Ukrainian Police, and the Holocaust.” Seventh Annual Danyliw Research Seminar onContemporary. Ukraine, Ottawa, 20–22 Oct.
Line 104: Line 111:
  
 Katchanovski, I. (2015). Terrorists or national heroes? Politics and perceptions of the OUN and the UPA in Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48(2-3), 217-228. (retracted scholar) Katchanovski, I. (2015). Terrorists or national heroes? Politics and perceptions of the OUN and the UPA in Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48(2-3), 217-228. (retracted scholar)
 +
 +Marples, D. R. (2010). Anti-Soviet partisans and Ukrainian memory. East European Politics and Societies, 24(01), 26-43.
  
 Marples, D. R. (2020). Stepan Bandera: The Life and Afterlife of a Ukrainian Nationalist: Fascism, Genocide, and Cult Grzegorz Rossolinski-Liebe.(??? needs evaluation) Marples, D. R. (2020). Stepan Bandera: The Life and Afterlife of a Ukrainian Nationalist: Fascism, Genocide, and Cult Grzegorz Rossolinski-Liebe.(??? needs evaluation)
Line 112: Line 121:
  
 Nikolaev, N. Y., Yurchenko, D. S., Yu Nikolaev, N., & S Yurchenko, D. Media Space As A “Battlefield”: A Historical Narrative Of Modern Ukrainian Media. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 102. Nikolaev, N. Y., Yurchenko, D. S., Yu Nikolaev, N., & S Yurchenko, D. Media Space As A “Battlefield”: A Historical Narrative Of Modern Ukrainian Media. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 102.
 +
 +Patryliak, I., & Pahiria, O. (2023). AN UNFINISHED WAR: THE HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE ORGANISATION OF UKRAINIAN NATIONALISTS AND THE UKRAINIAN INSURGENT ARMY PROBLEMS. Journal of the Institute of Latvian History/Latvijas Vēstures Institūta Žurnāls, (119).
  
 Portnov, A. 2016b. “Clash of Victimhoods: The Volhynian Massacre in Polish and Ukrainian Memory.” Open Democracy, 16 Nov. Retrieved 20 Nov 2016from https://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/andrii-portnov/clash-of-victimhood-1943-volhynian-massacre-in-polish-and-ukrainian-culture. Portnov, A. 2016b. “Clash of Victimhoods: The Volhynian Massacre in Polish and Ukrainian Memory.” Open Democracy, 16 Nov. Retrieved 20 Nov 2016from https://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/andrii-portnov/clash-of-victimhood-1943-volhynian-massacre-in-polish-and-ukrainian-culture.
Line 133: Line 144:
  
 Sanders, R. Glorifying Ukrainian-Canadian Veterans of OUN/UPA Terrorism. URL: http://coat. ncf. ca/P4C/68/68_40-55. pdf (дата звернення 26.08. 2020). Sanders, R. Glorifying Ukrainian-Canadian Veterans of OUN/UPA Terrorism. URL: http://coat. ncf. ca/P4C/68/68_40-55. pdf (дата звернення 26.08. 2020).
 +
 +Snyder, T. (1999). “To resolve the Ukrainian problem once and for all”: The ethnic cleansing of Ukrainians in Poland, 1943–1947. Journal of Cold War Studies, 1(2), 86-120.
 +
 +Snyder, T. (2003). The causes of Ukrainian-Polish ethnic cleansing 1943. Past & Present, (179), 197-234.
 +
 +Snyder, T. (2014). Fascism, Russia and Ukraine. Hourglass NGO.
  
 Struve, K. (2020). The OUN (b), the Germans, and Anti-Jewish Violence in Eastern Galicia during Summer 1941. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, 6, 205-235. Struve, K. (2020). The OUN (b), the Germans, and Anti-Jewish Violence in Eastern Galicia during Summer 1941. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, 6, 205-235.
  
 Temirov, B. STEPAN BANDERA’S PERSONALITY IN THE INFORMATION CONFRONTATION. EVROPSKÝ FILOZOFICKÝ, 93. Temirov, B. STEPAN BANDERA’S PERSONALITY IN THE INFORMATION CONFRONTATION. EVROPSKÝ FILOZOFICKÝ, 93.
 +
 +Tottle, D. (1987). Fraud, famine and fascism: The Ukrainian genocide myth from Hitler to Harvard. Progress Books.
 +
 +Umland, A., & Yurchuk, Y. (2018). Introduction: Essays in the Historical Interpretation of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, 4(2), 29-34.
  
 Yurchuk, Y. (2017). Reclaiming the past, confronting the past: OUN–UPA memory politics and nation building in Ukraine (1991–2016). War and memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, 107-137. Yurchuk, Y. (2017). Reclaiming the past, confronting the past: OUN–UPA memory politics and nation building in Ukraine (1991–2016). War and memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, 107-137.
banderite.1692066840.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)