Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- redaction [2021/10/08 15:57] – created jgmac1106
+++ redaction [2021/10/08 15:59] (current) – jgmac1106
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <p>Imagine spray painting every speed limit sign in town and telling an officer who pulled you over that you "decontrolled the data" and no longer have to follow posted regulations. You will get arrested.
-<p>Can you head to your local hardware store, grab a few bottles of spray paint, grabbing your graffitti kicks, tucked away where you think folks don't know you hide them, and head out to paint every speed limit sign, you  "Decontrol the regulations and make regulation less burnedsome?"</p>
+<p>Can you head to your local hardware store, grab a few bottles of spray paint, g and head out to paint every speed limit sign, you  "Decontrol the regulations and make regulation less burdensome?"</p>
-<p>Of course not, especially in a school zone, extra speed regulations apply and as a licsened driver you have signed a social contract to know and uphold the laws.</p>
+<p>Of course not, especially in a school zone, extra speed regulations apply and as a licensed driver you have signed a social contract to know and uphold the laws.</p>
 <p>Yet  a good many small manufacturers thinks they can redact legacy distribution statements, or more likely receive documents with legacy markings and distribution statements redacted from a prime and confidently say they don't have CUI.</p>
-<p>The controlling label, orginator, legacy markings, and distrubution statments do not make CUI Controlled Unclassifired Information. Being Conntrolled Unclassified Information makes data CUI.</p>
+<p>The controlling label, originator, legacy markings, and distribution statements do not make CUI Controlled Unclassified Information. Being Controlled Unclassified Information makes data CUI.</p>
-<p>These methods to decontrol, or what some erroenously refer to as declassify CUI through redaction as about as effective as spray painting a speed limit sign.</p>
+<p>These methods to decontrol, or what some erroneously refer to as declassify CUI through redaction as about as effective as spray painting a speed limit sign.</p>
-<h2>History of Distibution Statements</h2>
+<h2>History of Distribution Statements</h2>
  DoDI 5230.24
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
  <h2>The Flawed Logic</h2>
-<p> Since DoD Guidance says the presence of a distibution statements means a legacy document equals data requiring CUI protection, redacting that diistrubution statement means the data does not need a CUI label and thus 171 protection. </p>
+<p> Since DoD Guidance says the presence of a distribution statements means a legacy document equals data requiring CUI protection, redacting that distribution statement means the data does not need a CUI label and thus 171 protection. </p>
  <p>This is the same as saying if I paint over the speed limit sign this road has no speed limit.</p>
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
-<h3>Contractor Responsibility with Redacted Distribution Statemet</h3>
+<h3>Contractor Responsibility with Redacted Distribution Statement</h3>
 <h2>How CUI Gets decontrolled</h2>
 <h2>Dissagregation and DFARS</h2>
 </html>